The News GodThe News GodThe News God
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
      • Biography
      • Net Worth
      • Famous Birthdays
    • General
    • Games
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Reading: Martin Amidu to Ato Forson: You have 7-day to retract comments
Share
Font ResizerAa
The News GodThe News God
Font ResizerAa
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • More
Search
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • General
    • Games
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • My Bookmarks
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Media Partners
The News God > Blog > News > Martin Amidu to Ato Forson: You have 7-day to retract comments
NewsPolitics

Martin Amidu to Ato Forson: You have 7-day to retract comments

Sampson Gaddah
Last updated: August 2, 2019 12:13 pm
Sampson Gaddah
August 2, 2019
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

The Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu has given the Minority member, Cassiel Ato Forson a seven-day ultimatum to apologise and retract some comments he allegedly made in reference to a judgement debt payment.

Mr Amidu in a letter to Mr Forson dated August 1, 2019, demands an unqualified apology and retraction of the said comments which he described as defamatory.

According to Mr Amidu, he has never been paid any money by any Government in my official capacity or because of my position as the Special Prosecutor as a judgment debt as Mr Forson claims.

Read also: VIDEO – YOU IDIOTS THINK THE NEWYORK TIMES IS LIKE ASEMPA FM- KELVIN »

Related Posts

Fox News Today: Eric Trump says impeachment is Democrats’ Hail Mary for 2020
Fox News Today: Eric Trump says impeachment is Democrats’ Hail Mary for 2020
Trump vs. Biden: The media’s treatment of each campaign differs noticeably
New York Times editorial board endorses Warren, Klobuchar for president
Fox News Today: Abandoned Alaska child, 5, carries toddler a half-mile in sub-zero temps in socks, light clothes: police

“Your intentional, malicious and deliberate defamatory words used to describe any payments to me of any part of the outstanding orders of the Court given on 4th September 2014 were understood by ordinary and right-thinking members of the public to mean and you intended them to mean that the Government unlawfully had colluded with me in my capacity as the Special Prosecutor to dubiously pay me some money and other benefits resulting from Court orders,” Mr Amidu said in a statement published on his website.

“The words you used in describing my supposed dubious collusion with the present Government to satisfy outstanding orders accepted and left by your Government also expressly and by innuendoes created in the minds of right thinking member of the public that I lacked the high moral integrity to be the Special Prosecutor.

Read also: NAM1 STILL LOCKED UP BY POLICE »

“I am by this letter, therefore, demanding an unqualified apology and retraction from you, Cassiel Ato Baah Forson, of your defamatory statements and publications about me alleging the dubious payments of judgment debts to me as the Special Prosecutor within seven days. made with me at my nomination to fight the canker of corruption were not intended to be actualized in practice”.

In the letter, Mr Amidu stated that on July 12, Mr Forson addressed a press conference outside the floor and chamber of Parliament where he said the Special Prosecutor had been paid a judgement debt.

“The interview you granted to the Parliamentary Press corps while standing with them outside the chamber of Parliament in which you made the said international, deliberate, malicious and defamatory statements about me and two other entities have been published on air, repeated and discussed extensively on several of the print and electronic media. Your voice recording has also been widely played and discussed in the media while video recording have been published and also discussed on the electronic media including YouTube,” the letter said.

Read also: VIDEO: KELVIN MAKES MOCKERY OF NPP AMID LEGAL BATTLE. »

“In making and causing the defamatory materials to be published about me in my current official capacity as the Special Prosecutor, you as a former Deputy Minister for Finance from 2013 to 6th January 2017 and the current Ranking Member of the Finance Committee of Parliament knew that I had not obtained any judgment or order(s) from any court of competent jurisdiction in my capacity as the Special Prosecutor to be paid any judgment debt since my nomination, approval and appointment to the Office of the Special Prosecutor. Nonetheless, you chose out of malice and with the intention to defame me in person and in my current office as Special Prosecutor to refer to me by the title of my current appointment as a public officer instead of my personal name in making and publishing your defamatory statement about my person and integrity”.

Mr Forson’s comments followed a disclosure by the Finance Minister to Parliament that the Akufo-Addo administration had paid over GHc280 million as judgment debts since it took office in 2017.

Read also: REVELED: WHY GOVERNMENT WAS FORCED TO SIGN ‘FRAUDULENT’ PDS AGREEMENT »

Mr. Amidu also stressed that a court case, which began on January 30, 2013, where he sued for payment of his salary areas, was done in a personal capacity and not as Special Prosecutor.

He said he commenced the personal action for arrears of rent allowance, payment for earned annual leave, terminal benefits, compensation for breach of contract and accrued interest on the said sums from the date of accrual to the date of payment.

“As Deputy Minister for Finance in the previous Government from 2013 to 6th January 2017 you knew that I commenced an action in my personal name on 30th January 2013 in Suit No. AP/159/13in the case of Martin A. B. K. Amidu vs the Attorney-General seeking an order for the payment of my salary arrears, arrears of rent allowance, payment for earned annual leave, terminal benefits, compensation for breach of contract with accrued interest on the said sums from the date of accrual to the date of payment, amongst others”.

Source: GraphicOnline

Jimmy Carter returns to Sunday school, talks about his own mortality
Miss Teen Rodeo Kansas, 19, Dies in Car Accident; Teammates Injured
At Great Smoky Mountains National Park, a bear attacked and wounded a mother and daughter.
Recent Roe v. Wade data from the US Supreme Court confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s predictions.
Fox News Today: DEA warns against THC-infused vaping cartridges
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Video – You idiots think the NewYork Times is Like Asempa FM- Kelvin
Next Article kidnapped Takoradi girls found dead

Latest Publications

Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting
2 Children Killed, 20 Injured In Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting
News
August 27, 2025
Hamas probably wouldn’t have attacked if Trump were the president, says Benjamin Netanyahu
Hamas “probably” wouldn’t have attacked if Trump were the president, says Benjamin Netanyahu
News
August 27, 2025
Denmark summons top US officials
Denmark summons top US officials over suspected influence operations in Greenland
Politics
August 27, 2025
From Classic to Contemporary: 8 Most Entertaining Vampire Books Ever Written
Entertainment
August 27, 2025
New York Tour Bus Crash
At least 5 dead, Dozen Injured in New York Tour Bus Crash
News
August 26, 2025

Stay Connected

235.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
11.6kFollowersPin
56.4kFollowersFollow
136kSubscribersSubscribe

You Might also Like

Supreme Court denies bid by Yeshiva University to block LGBTQ+ student organization The Supreme Court has denied Yeshiva University's bid to block an LGBTQ+ student organization from forming on its campus. The university had argued that the group would violate its religious beliefs, but the court rejected that argument. This means that the group can go ahead and form, and LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva will have a place to turn for support and community. -Supreme Court denies Yeshiva University's bid to block LGBTQ+ student organization The Supreme Court on Monday denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization on its campus. The court's decision not to hear the case leaves in place a lower court ruling that found the university had violated the rights of students when it denied them the ability to form the group. The case began in 2017, when a group of students at Yeshiva University attempted to form an LGBTQ+ student organization called "Allies." The university denied their request, citing the school's "religious mission." The students then sued the university, alleging that the denial of their request violated their rights under the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. A federal district court ruled in favor of the students, and the university appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. That court also ruled in favor of the students, finding that the university had violated their constitutional rights. The university then asked the Supreme Court to hear the case, but the court declined to do so, leaving the lower court's ruling in place. This means that Yeshiva University must allow the formation of the LGBTQ+ student organization on its campus. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case is a victory for the students and for LGBTQ+ rights more broadly. It is also a reminder that universities must respect the constitutional rights of their students. -Justices rule unanimously in favor of students' right to form club The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in favor of students' right to form a club on the campus of Yeshiva University, a private Jewish institution in New York City. The Court's decision means that the university must now allow an LGBTQ+ student organization to form on its campus. The case began when a group of students attempted to form an LGBTQ+ club at Yeshiva University in 2016. The university denied their request, citing the school's religious mission. The students then sued the university, arguing that their First Amendment rights were being violated. The Supreme Court's decision is a victory for the students and for LGBTQ+ rights more broadly. It sends a strong message that private institutions cannot discriminate against students on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. -Yeshiva had argued that club would violate school's religious mission Yeshiva University had argued that the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization would violate the school's religious mission. The Supreme Court has denied this bid, ruling that the school must allow the club to form. This is a significant victory for LGBTQ+ rights, as it sets a precedent that religious institutions cannot discriminate against LGBTQ+ students. -Club will be allowed to operate on campus The Supreme Court has denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization on campus. The university had argued that the club would violate the school's religious beliefs, but the Court ruled that the school had not provided enough evidence to support that claim. This is a victory for LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva and other religious colleges who have been fighting for the right to form these organizations on campus. It is also a reminder that the Supreme Court will not always side with religious institutions when it comes to issues of equality and civil rights. -Students hail ruling as victory for inclusivity In a victory for inclusivity, the Supreme Court has denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block an LGBTQ+ student organization from forming on campus. The decision means that the group, called Queer Alliance, can proceed with its plans to provide support and advocacy for LGBTQ+ students at the university. The case began when Yeshiva University administrators tried to block the formation of Queer Alliance, claiming that the group's mission was not compatible with the university's religious values. However, the Supreme Court's decision means that the group can go ahead with its plans, and it is a victory for LGBTQ+ rights on campus. The ruling is a welcome development for LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva University, who have long been underserved by the university's administration. The formation of Queer Alliance will help to create a more inclusive and supportive campus environment for all students.
News

Supreme Court denies bid by Yeshiva University to block LGBTQ+ student organization

September 15, 2022
Politics

Bernie Sanders defends colleague octogenarian Joe Biden: “It seemed acceptable to me”

August 27, 2023
The Cause of Death for Dave Rainford - What We Know!!
News

The Cause of Death for Dave Rainford – What We Know!!

March 26, 2022
Politics

Trump Leaves for Florida in Preparation for His Next Federal Court Appearance

June 12, 2023
Show More
© 2025 Thenewsgod. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Authors
  • Media Partners
  • Videos
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?