Supreme Court has delayed a ruling on a lawsuit that could overturn Roe v. Wade.

On Monday, the Supreme Court did not issue a decision regarding whether or not it will overturn Roe v. Wade, as was widely anticipated.

On Monday, the Supreme Court decided to postpone making a ruling over whether or not the legal right to have an abortion should be overturned.

Politico published a draft rule that had been obtained through a leak about a month ago that suggested the Supreme Court may decide to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark case from 1973 that established a constitutional right to abortion.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was not one of the cases that the Supreme Court decided on Monday, but it did rule on several other cases that involved immigration law. One of those cases was Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. We should be able to come to a conclusion by the end of June or the beginning of July at the latest.

Following the publication of the following decisions on Monday: ZF Automotive US Inc. v. Luxshare Ltd. ZF Automotive US, Inc v Denezpi Ltd United States of America v. Denezpi Ltd. Kemp, Kemp, Kemp Garland v. Gonzalez and Arteaga-Martinez v. Johnson are two instances that were decided recently.

At issue in the Dobbs, the case is the constitutionality of a Mississippi statute that bans abortions beyond the 15th week of pregnancy. The argument for the case took place in December, and it is widely regarded as the most important test yet of the new 6-3 majority on the court that was selected by Republicans. This majority will be filled in 2020 with the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

While the Supreme Court works to finalize its judgment in Dobbs and several other cases before its summer holiday, the inquiry into who leaked the draft opinion by court personnel continues.

“If the Court discloses material that should be kept confidential, our company operations will not be affected in any way. The operation of the Court will in no way be impeded by this.” Chief Justice John Roberts expressed his thoughts in a statement that was made public in May.

According to his comments, “This was an isolated and egregious breach of that trust, an embarrassment to the Court and the community of public servants who serve here,” “I have given instructions to the Marshal of the Court to look into the source of the leak,” he added.