The News GodThe News GodThe News God
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
      • Biography
      • Net Worth
      • Famous Birthdays
    • General
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Reading: Democratic impeachment managers blast McConnell’s trial rules as ‘rigged’
Share
Font ResizerAa
The News GodThe News God
Font ResizerAa
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
Search
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • General
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • My Bookmarks
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Media Partners
The News God > Blog > Politics > Democratic impeachment managers blast McConnell’s trial rules as ‘rigged’
Politics

Democratic impeachment managers blast McConnell’s trial rules as ‘rigged’

Sampson Gaddah
Last updated: January 21, 2020 10:24 am
Sampson Gaddah
January 21, 2020
Share
8 Min Read
democratic-impeachment-managers-blast-mcconnell’s-trial-rules-as-‘rigged’
SHARE

The House managers prosecuting the case against President Trump blasted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s proposed trial rules as “rigged,” just hours before impeachment proceedings are slated to resume on the floor.

The blistering statement from the impeachment managers came after McConnell, late Monday, revealed his resolution.

Also Read: House Democrats urge Senate to eliminate the threat; of Trump, in opening impeachment trial salvo

The resolution showed a condensed, two-day calendar for each side to give opening statements, at 12 hours per day. After the four days of opening arguments, senators would be allowed up to 16 hours for written questions to the prosecution and defense, followed by four hours of debate. Only then would there be votes on calling other witnesses—something that, if approved, would likely happen next week. At the end of the deliberations, the Senate would then vote on each impeachment article.

Related Posts

SCOTUS safety bill sponsor slams Dem for ‘obstruction’ following armed man arrest near Brett Kavanaugh’s home.
Klobuchar says she’s moving on to New Hampshire ‘no matter what’
Jordan’s bid for speaker acquires significant momentum as key Republican holdouts come around.
Trump condemned to pay more than $80 million in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case.

“For weeks, Mitch McConnell has asserted that he planned to follow the ‘Clinton precedent’ for structuring President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial. It is now clear why he hid his proposed resolution all this time and released it the night before the trial is set to begin,” the managers wrote in a statement Tuesday morning. “His resolution deviates sharply from the Clinton precedent—and common sense—in an effort to prevent the full truth of the President’s misconduct from coming to light.”

The Democratic “managers” include House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif; House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.; and Reps. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y; Val Demings, D-Fla.; Jason Crow, D-Colo.; Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; and Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas.

The managers argued that during the 1999 impeachment, Clinton provided “more than 90,000 pages” of documents before the trial took place, “all of the witnesses had testified before the Senate trial began,” and the only issue was “whether they would be re-called to testify once more.”

“Here, McConnell is trying to prevent the witness from ever testifying, and the public from ever finding out what they have to say,” they wrote. “If those efforts are successful, this will be the first impeachment trial in American history in which the Senate did not allow the House to present its case with witnesses and documents. The McConnell Resolution goes so far as to suggest it may not even allow the evidence gathered by the House to be admitted.”

Also Read: Trump taunts Bloomberg, claims he’s intentionally avoiding Dem debates

They added: “That is not a fair trial. In fact, it is no trial at all.”

McConnell is slated to formally introduce his proposal to lay out the rules to govern the trial on Tuesday—rules that he has repeatedly said would mirror those the Senate used in the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton in 1999.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had for weeks been holding onto the articles of impeachment—charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—in a bid to extract favorable terms for the trial, including a commitment from McConnell on witnesses and additional document requests. But once McConnell made clear he was unwilling to negotiate, she ended the delay, and transmitted the articles.

Pelosi on Tuesday slammed McConnell’s plan, saying “the Clinton comparison was a lie.”

“Leader McConnell’s plan for a dark of night impeachment trial confirms what the American people have seen since Day One: the Senate GOP Leader has chosen a cover-up for the President, rather than to honor his oath to the Constitution,” she said in a statement. “Leader McConnell’s process is deliberately designed to hide the truth from the Senate and from the American people, because he knows that the President’s wrongdoing is indefensible and demands removal.”

She added: “No jury would be asked to operate on McConnell’s absurdly compressed schedule, and it is obvious that no Senator who votes for it is intending to truly weigh the damning evidence of the President’s attacks on our Constitution.”

But Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, who was part of a small group of GOP senators who said they wanted to consider witness testimony and documents that weren’t part of the House impeachment investigation, said that McConnell’s resolution, overall, “aligns closely with the rules package approved 100-0 during the Clinton trial.”

“If attempts are made to vote on witnesses prior to opening arguments, I would oppose those efforts,” Romney said.

The Senate trial is slated to begin at 1 p.m. ET Tuesday. House managers and the president’s defense will debate McConnell’s proposal, followed by hours of closed session debate from senators on the same proposal. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., will have the chance to introduce a counter-proposal, which senators will debate on. Later in the evening, the Senate will have its final roll call vote on McConnell’s proposal, which will dictate the terms for the trial going forward.

Schumer, late Sunday, vowed that he would “force a vote on witnesses and documents” in the trial.

“We Democrats aim to get the truth,” Schumer said. “Make no mistake about it, we will force votes on witnesses and documents, and it will be up to four Republicans to side with the Constitution, to side with our democracy, to side with the rule of law, and not side, in blind obeisance, to President Trump and his desire to suppress the truth. Because, in my judgment, he probably thinks he’s guilty.”

As for possible witnesses, Democrats have called for testimony from former National Security Adviser John Bolton for weeks. Bolton, earlier this month, signaled that he would be open to testifying, and would comply with the request, should he receive a congressional subpoena.

Republicans, though, have warned of “witness reciprocity,” which would mean that GOP senators could request testimony from their own witnesses in exchange for Democrat-sought witness testimony.

Republicans have not committed to doing so, but many have floated calling former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, as a witness.

Hunter emerged as a central figure in the Ukraine controversy due to his business dealings.

The inquiry began when a whistleblower reported that Trump had pushed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to launch an investigation into the Biden family’s dealings in Ukraine—specifically, why Joe Biden pressured former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire a top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, where Hunter held a lucrative role on the board, bringing in a reported $50,000 per month.

House Republicans noted that in testimony from former State Department official George Kent, he raised concerns about “the appearance of a conflict of interest stemming from Mr. Biden’s position on Burisma’s board.”

At the time, the former vice president was running U.S.-Ukraine policy under former President Barack Obama.

Fox News’ Mike Emanuel and Chad Pergram contributed to this report. 

Nevada Dems anxious over new election tool after Iowa meltdown: ‘Recipe for disaster’
Supreme Court rejects prior ruling, enables Jewish university to refuse LGBTQ+ recognition
Bosnia and the Dayton (Dis)agreement: 25 Years Later
Senate urges Army to develop neural sensors to monitor troops’ exhaustion and stress.
Rep. Joe Wilson declares his intentions to propose a $250 bill with Trump’s face on it
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article ex-nigeria-star-finidi-george-handed-ambassadorial-role Ex-Nigeria star Finidi George handed ambassadorial role
Next Article chief-justice-roberts-pulls-double-duty-with-court-arguments,-impeachment-trial Chief Justice Roberts pulls double duty with court arguments, impeachment trial
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Publications

The Impact of Virtual School on Student Engagement and Success
Education
June 23, 2025
SolaZola Wiki: Bio, Boyfriend, Instagram, Net Worth, Videos and Real Name
SolaZola Wiki: Bio, Boyfriend, Instagram, Net Worth, Videos and Real Name
Entertainment
May 2, 2021
Violet Summers Bio: Wiki, Boyfriend, Biography, Net Worth
Violet Summers Bio: Wiki, Boyfriend, Biography, Net Worth
Entertainment
February 6, 2021
Telegram CEO to share $17bn wealth among his 106 'sperm' children
Telegram CEO to share $17 billion wealth among his 106 ‘sperm’ children
News
June 23, 2025
Cherry Candle bio
Cherry Candle’s biography, age, wiki, net worth, boyfriend, OnlyFans, and more.
Biography
June 23, 2025

Stay Connected

235.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
11.6kFollowersPin
56.4kFollowersFollow
136kSubscribersSubscribe

You Might also Like

hillary-clinton-‘intimidated’-by-tulsi-gabbard’s-$50m-lawsuit,-won’t-accept-legal-documents,-lawyer-claims:-report
Politics

Hillary Clinton ‘intimidated’ by Tulsi Gabbard’s $50M lawsuit, won’t accept legal documents, lawyer claims: report

January 30, 2020
Politics

Harris to promote abortion in Florida on Roe v. Wade’s anniversary.

January 19, 2023
Politics

Following McCarthy’s resignation, the House GOP majority has officially shrunk to three seats.

January 2, 2024
what-are-the-democratic-presidential-candidates’-religions?
Politics

Religion of Democrats Presidential Candidates

January 27, 2020
Show More
© 2025 Thenewsgod. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Authors
  • Media Partners
  • Videos
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?