The News GodThe News GodThe News God
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
      • Biography
      • Net Worth
      • Famous Birthdays
    • General
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Reading: Biden Pressured to Take Action Against Oil Companies Trading with Venezuela Following Maduro’s Refusal to Step Down
Share
Font ResizerAa
The News GodThe News God
Font ResizerAa
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
Search
  • Politics
    • Trump
  • News
    • Wars & Conflicts
  • Business & Finance
  • Lifestyle & Health
  • Law
  • Sports
  • Tech & Autos
  • Home & Garden
  • Videos
  • More
    • Travel & Tour
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • General
    • Pets
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Media Partners
    • Why You Need to Read Business News Everyday
    • Authors
    • Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • My Bookmarks
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Media Partners
The News God > Blog > News > Biden Pressured to Take Action Against Oil Companies Trading with Venezuela Following Maduro’s Refusal to Step Down
News

Biden Pressured to Take Action Against Oil Companies Trading with Venezuela Following Maduro’s Refusal to Step Down

Torffic Frimpong
Last updated: September 26, 2024 4:01 pm
Torffic Frimpong - Content Writer
September 26, 2024
Share
7 Min Read
Biden Pressured to Take Action Against Oil Companies Trading with Venezuela Following Maduro's Refusal to Step Down
SHARE

On August 1, the US administration acknowledged the opposition leader’s election victory, but Maduro remains in office.

The Biden administration attempted to convince despot Nicolas Maduro to organize free and fair elections by easing sanctions against his country earlier this year. It was unsuccessful.

Observers of Latin America now argue that it’s time to fully reinstate those restrictions by revoking American oil and gas corporations’ permits to operate in the region.

As Maduro persisted in clamping down on the opposition, notably by disqualifying opposition primary winner Maria Corina Machado from contesting, the United States reimposed sanctions on the gold mining sector that had been removed earlier this year under the Barbados Agreement in April.

Related Posts

Radio Journalist Killed in Southern Philippines
Radio Journalist Killed in Southern Philippines
This year’s Pride march has been canceled due to a uniform ban.
Anthony Joshua Net Worth 2021
Explosions Rock Lebanon as Attack Targets Hezbollah Members

Critics claim the government left significant exceptions for American businesses conducting business there, although it did let specific sanctions relief and export permits expire.

The National Electoral Commission of Venezuela declared in July that Maduro had won 51.2% of the vote, besting Machado-backed Edmundo González, the candidate for the Unity Platform. However, the opposition’s precinct-level vote tallies indicate González winning by a sizable majority. On August 1, the U.S. government declared González the victor, but Maduro remains in office.

U.S. officials announced fresh personal sanctions against Maduro and his supporters in September due to human rights violations. Victoria Coates, a former senior counsellor at the Department of Energy under President Trump and deputy national security advisor, told Fox News Digital that “the individual sanctions are meaningless and obviously haven’t changed [Maduro’s] behavior one bit.”

González was accused of terrorism before seeking sanctuary at the Spanish embassy as part of the severe post-election suppression tactics used by the Maduro administration to impose their own interpretation of the election results. González said last week that before being let to apply for asylum in Spain, he was “forced” to recognize Maduro’s victory.

“They’ve done nothing serious to try to challenge the results of the fraudulent election, to support the folks who are trying to get the information out, and then to offer an off-ramp to Maduro.”

Coates said, “Get him out of the country and find out what his terms are.” “Incidentally, a number of Venezuela’s top military officials enjoy frequent trips to Miami. Do you want to take a chance on that?”

“They may see whether they could talk to them about what a change would entail. But they’re just letting the oil pour instead of taking any action.”

According to Andres Martinez-Fernandez, lead Latin America policy adviser at Heritage’s Allison Center for National Security, “the administration is, on the one hand, doing some actions that would make it appear that it is heightening enforcement against the Maduro regime,” he told Fox News Digital.

“But it’s clearly holding off on really restating and fully pressuring the Venezuelan government with sanctions and economic restrictions, particularly when it comes to the oil sector.”

One way to achieve this goal is to increase the access of large oil firms like Chevron to do business with PDVSA, the nation’s state-owned oil company. Following Maduro’s declaration that he was open to holding free and fair elections, Chevron was granted permission to conduct business with the oil-rich state in 2022. The White House does not rule out the prospect of other companies applying for such licenses to take advantage of the nation’s oil-rich reserves. 

As soon as Rep. Maria Salazar, R-Fla., chair of the House Foreign Affairs Western Hemisphere Subcommittee, refused to acknowledge the election results showing Maduro losing by two million votes, the oil licenses—which only serve him and his allies—should have been canceled, she told Fox News Digital.

“The failure to make these decisions is sending a clear signal around the world that United States leadership is weak, and you can get away with whatever you want.”

At a panel discussion earlier this month organized by the New York-based Council of the Americas business organization, opposition adviser Rafael de la Cruz stated, “We want them canceled… this is a lifeline to the regime.”

According to him, the American oil firms’ presence in Venezuela helps to “normalize the de facto dictatorship that he is trying to establish there.”

The goal of the sanctions, according to the National Security Council, is to “hold Nicolas Maduro and his representatives accountable for its violent repression and electoral fraud, without harming the everyday Venezuelan people.”

However, detractors contend that the majority of Venezuelans—nearly 80% of them live in poverty—rarely benefit from oil revenues.

Andres Martinez-Fernandez stated, “The regime itself is the primary sanction facing the Venezuelan people.”

“The Venezuelan regime uses its revenue primarily not to support the Venezuelan people, but to ensure its own grasp on power, whether that’s through buying loyalty in the military or sowing discord abroad” he continued.

The senator from Florida, Marco Rubio, told Fox News Digital, “[The sanctions] never should have been lifted; they got scammed.”

It’s debatable why the Biden administration hasn’t pursued enforcement action.

According to Coates, the purpose is “to keep domestic energy prices low before the election.”

According to Martinez-Fernandez, there may be a lot of lobbying going on behind the scenes, and the government might be concerned that if American businesses left the scene, China would be able to move in and establish operations.

“The administration is still hoping beyond reason that there is a path to a sort of negotiated settlement with the regime,” he stated. “Earlier this year and towards the end of last year, the administration removed sanctions and then threatened to reinstate them. And it’s obvious it didn’t have the anticipated results.”

In response, Chevron spokesperson Bill Turenne stated, “We remain committed to conducting our business in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, both in the U.S. and the countries where we operate.”

49ers’ Ricky Pearsall’s Mother Updates on Son’s Health After Shooting: ‘GOD Shielded Him’
Israel kills four militants crossing the northern border as the possibility of a Hezbollah battle grows.
Kevin Taylor’s “With all Due Respect” launches App for Android and iOS
More than 20 Killed in Sudan Military Plane Crash After Aircraft’s Takeoff
Rescuers from India drill through rubble to reach colleagues trapped in a collapsed tunnel.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Supporting Aging Luigi Spadorcia: Supporting Aging Parents with Strategies for Their Well-Being and Care
Next Article Children using smartphones UK parents join the fight to ban smartphones for kids under 14

Latest Publications

Kenya Bus and Train Accident
At Least 4 Killed and Dozen Injured After Train and bus collide in central Kenya
News
August 7, 2025
Kenya Plane Crash
Six killed In Kenya’s Light Aircraft Crash
News
August 7, 2025
Valedictorian’s Mother and Tutor Caught Stealing Exam Papers
Mother and teacher steal exam papers to help student become valedictorian
News
August 5, 2025
World’s Oldest Baby Born from 30-Year-Old Frozen Embryo
World’s oldest baby born from 30-year-old frozen embryo
News
August 4, 2025
Kenyan mental health activist claims to be Elon Musk's eldest son
Kenyan mental health activist claims to be Elon Musk’s eldest son
News
August 7, 2025

Stay Connected

235.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
11.6kFollowersPin
56.4kFollowersFollow
136kSubscribersSubscribe

You Might also Like

News

The unsolved cold case leads cops to a wrong-body dig in a Connecticut cemetery.

June 11, 2022
Fox News Today: Danny Aiello, ‘Do The Right Thing’ star, dead at 86
News

Fox News Today: Danny Aiello, ‘Do The Right Thing’ star, dead at 86

December 13, 2019
Kevin Mason
News

$10,000 Rewards for Information Ieading to Indianapolis Jail Release of Alleged Murderer.

September 24, 2023
Supreme Court denies bid by Yeshiva University to block LGBTQ+ student organization The Supreme Court has denied Yeshiva University's bid to block an LGBTQ+ student organization from forming on its campus. The university had argued that the group would violate its religious beliefs, but the court rejected that argument. This means that the group can go ahead and form, and LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva will have a place to turn for support and community. -Supreme Court denies Yeshiva University's bid to block LGBTQ+ student organization The Supreme Court on Monday denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization on its campus. The court's decision not to hear the case leaves in place a lower court ruling that found the university had violated the rights of students when it denied them the ability to form the group. The case began in 2017, when a group of students at Yeshiva University attempted to form an LGBTQ+ student organization called "Allies." The university denied their request, citing the school's "religious mission." The students then sued the university, alleging that the denial of their request violated their rights under the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. A federal district court ruled in favor of the students, and the university appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. That court also ruled in favor of the students, finding that the university had violated their constitutional rights. The university then asked the Supreme Court to hear the case, but the court declined to do so, leaving the lower court's ruling in place. This means that Yeshiva University must allow the formation of the LGBTQ+ student organization on its campus. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case is a victory for the students and for LGBTQ+ rights more broadly. It is also a reminder that universities must respect the constitutional rights of their students. -Justices rule unanimously in favor of students' right to form club The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in favor of students' right to form a club on the campus of Yeshiva University, a private Jewish institution in New York City. The Court's decision means that the university must now allow an LGBTQ+ student organization to form on its campus. The case began when a group of students attempted to form an LGBTQ+ club at Yeshiva University in 2016. The university denied their request, citing the school's religious mission. The students then sued the university, arguing that their First Amendment rights were being violated. The Supreme Court's decision is a victory for the students and for LGBTQ+ rights more broadly. It sends a strong message that private institutions cannot discriminate against students on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. -Yeshiva had argued that club would violate school's religious mission Yeshiva University had argued that the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization would violate the school's religious mission. The Supreme Court has denied this bid, ruling that the school must allow the club to form. This is a significant victory for LGBTQ+ rights, as it sets a precedent that religious institutions cannot discriminate against LGBTQ+ students. -Club will be allowed to operate on campus The Supreme Court has denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block the formation of an LGBTQ+ student organization on campus. The university had argued that the club would violate the school's religious beliefs, but the Court ruled that the school had not provided enough evidence to support that claim. This is a victory for LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva and other religious colleges who have been fighting for the right to form these organizations on campus. It is also a reminder that the Supreme Court will not always side with religious institutions when it comes to issues of equality and civil rights. -Students hail ruling as victory for inclusivity In a victory for inclusivity, the Supreme Court has denied a bid by Yeshiva University to block an LGBTQ+ student organization from forming on campus. The decision means that the group, called Queer Alliance, can proceed with its plans to provide support and advocacy for LGBTQ+ students at the university. The case began when Yeshiva University administrators tried to block the formation of Queer Alliance, claiming that the group's mission was not compatible with the university's religious values. However, the Supreme Court's decision means that the group can go ahead with its plans, and it is a victory for LGBTQ+ rights on campus. The ruling is a welcome development for LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva University, who have long been underserved by the university's administration. The formation of Queer Alliance will help to create a more inclusive and supportive campus environment for all students.
News

Supreme Court denies bid by Yeshiva University to block LGBTQ+ student organization

September 15, 2022
Show More
© 2025 Thenewsgod. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Authors
  • Media Partners
  • Videos
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?