Democrats’ presidential candidate Joe Biden has picked Kamala Harris as his running mate but is she the right choice? Politics is a tough game and once your name resurfaces, we dig your past and make reference to the good and bad activities you carried before.
Here are 7 Reasons Why Kamala Harris Will Be a Mess for Joe Biden and Democrats.
Kamala Harris is inconsistent and confused about health care: If you are looking for a politician who obviously doesn’t know anything about health care and keeps messing up and changing stands on the time, then obviously Kamala must come to mind.
This doesn’t only bother her party leaders but always her voters are more voters skeptical. In recent times Kamala Harris noted that she was in support of the abolition of private health care she didn’t get the ball to defend her stands in the public eye and denied her statement, claiming that she was didn’t hear the question thrown at her at the town hall.
If Kamala Harris claimed she didn’t hear the question then what was she responding to? She eventually released a health care plan that still included private health insurance. You can’t trust a great nation like America in the hands of someone who isn’t confident about her plans.
During the campaign, Harris shied away from discussing specifics about her career as a prosecutor, a strategic choice borne of the fear that voters on the left would criticize her over criminal justice issues. She even failed to give a sharp response to Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s misleading attacks against her record, leaving voters unclear about her positions.

Kamala Harris doesn’t have good relations with her staff and party members. Internal turmoil cost her Kamala Harris presidential bid in December 2019, with aides and others accusing Harris of mistreating her staff with sudden layoffs and allowing her sister, Maya, to have too much influence.
She ended her presidential campaign in December 2019, a month before the Iowa caucuses, after taking a hard look at her campaign’s financial future and low poll numbers. You can’t trust America in the hands of someone who does family and friends with public office couldn’t make good relations with that small staff numbers.
Kamala Harris reportedly owes $1M in bills from a failed presidential run: You can’t trust a country in the hands of someone who couldn’t manage her campaign let alone a country. She’s probably a disaster worse than any other candidate in the then primaries.
Kamala Harris refused to investigate the police shootings of two Black men. Black maltreatment is a concern for any caring American however Kamala Harris didn’t care enough during her time as an Attorney General. Not only her opponent complaint but right-thinking Americans believe Kamala Harris didn’t do enough to address police brutality
As an attorney general, she declined to prosecute the police shootings in 2014 and 2015 of two Black men. In the parliament, she also did not endorse a 2015 bill that would have required the attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor who specializes in police use of deadly force. It’s obvious she’s fair enough to lead a big country as an America
Kamala Harris’Wikipedia page was edited 408 times—far more than any other candidate on the shortlist –– in the span of three weeks, which people pointed to as a sign of her nomination as running mate (The Wikipedia page of Sen. Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton’s running mate in 2016, saw more activity than any other candidate). The edits, mostly made by one person, had scrubbed controversial information from her page, including her “tough-on-crime” record and her decision not to prosecute Steven Mnuchin for financial fraud in 2013.
She was under scrutiny during her tenure as San Francisco district attorney when a technician stole cocaine from the DA’s crime lab and mishandled evidence. Harris, trying to keep things under wraps, failed to inform defense attorneys. As a result, about a thousand drug-related cases had to be thrown out.
Later, as California attorney general, Harris declined to support two ballot initiatives that would’ve banned the death penalty—raising accusations of political opportunism and inconsistency on the controversial issue.
Credit: Politico